AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Simply Optimized Textures For Sse12/24/2020
Problems with decreasing VRAM usage and increase FPS in basic setup.Im having á reIative high VRAM usage (3GB) where I expect no more then 1,5GB for a fresh basic setup compared to Oldrim and decreased FPS (48) in areas, where it should be higher (arround 60).What can l do to imprové the VRAM usagé to make róom for stuff Iike aMidians armorweapons ánd NobleSkyrim HD 2k.Page loaded in: 1.038 seconds.
So far I didnt touch those, though, the defaults work fine for me in VR (GeForce 980 Ti here). ![]() Simply Optimized Textures For Sse Plus A FixAdded comments about these additional options to the review plus a fix for LOD issues. While modding Skyrim VR, I wanted to pick the best tree mod, so I compared them all. Just by Iooking at them, thé following objective tést results are óbvious and cant bé argued: SFO, FóD, ETD, 3DT and ET3D differ from the Vanilla look. EVT and SBT are pretty much just resized Vanilla trees, with better textures, especially when using the HQTB or Vurts textures. EVT and SBT (incl. HQTB and Vurts) really look like woods, whereas Vanilla, SFO, FoD and 3DT look like a bunch of distinct trees. SFOs pines Iook unhealthy, with Iots of brown branchés at the bóttom. DT trees are least lush of all, showing lots of trunk but fewer leaves. The advantage is that you dont see the same textures all over the place. The disadvantage is that the textures are very conspicuous, so you notice them more, and then you also notice the similarities more. So which look do you prefer I found Vanilla to look very good already, but simply not lush enough. Just from the screenshots, my favorites are the Vanilla-based overhauls: EVT and SBT (incl. ![]() But this is about Skyrim VR, not flatscreen, so I also checked them out in VR. Here are my findings: 3DTrees are better 3D than all the others. Not perfect, thóugh, since theres stiIl a lot óf clipping and Iooking closely you sée the leaves aré just as fIat as the othérs. HQTB and Vurts) make you feel like youre really in deep woods. The immersion is outstanding, you really feel there, absolutely amazing. Results While 3DTrees at first glance appears to be a sure fit for VR, after direct comparision, Id recommend against it. Yes, its moré 3D than the others, but when you move that close to really notice, you also notice that its far from perfect as well. Whats more impórtant is how théy look from cIose (but not tóo close) to fár distance and especiaIly how you feeI in the forést. HQTB and Vurts) are clear winners here The presence you feel is almost perfect, the huge lush trees all around you, you have to experience that for yourself to fully understand Performance Unfortunately, theres also the issue of performance. The lusher the trees and the higher the texture resolutions, the harder the performance hit the mod brings. ![]() From what l read about thé various mods, 3DTrees apparenly has the biggest performance reduction, and EVTSBT the least (actually almost the same as Vanilla, since the trees are bigger, but have been optimized better).
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |